Frantisek Sumsal ae940730c6 sd-journal: prefer machine ID from the tail entry
compare_boot_ids() (from 262299dccb) skips
the tail entry realtime timestamp ordering when the compared locations
are from two different machines (and hence have two different machine
IDs) - in that case we fall through to a realtime comparison between the
two locations. This works fine except for journals that were imported
via systemd-journal-remote - the machine ID in the journal header is set
to the receiving machine's ID instead of the original one; but the
original machine ID is kept in the _MACHINE_ID= field.

This, however, defeats the check in compare_boot_ids() so we treat the
remote journals as local ones and try to compare the boots based on
their tail entry realtime timestamps, which results in grouping the
entries by their boot ID instead of interleaving them by their realtime
timestamp.

Given that we (transitively) call journal_file_read_tail_timestamp()
from compare_boot_ids(), where we both (re)set the newest_machine_id
field to the machine ID from the journal header and have the tail entry
at hand, let's try to get the _MACHINE_ID= field from the tail entry and
set newest_machine_id to that if it's present and valid. This way
compare_boot_ids() will correctly determine that the entries are from
two different machines and compare_locations() eventually falls through
to the entry realtime check, so we end up with properly interleaved
entries instead of entries grouped by boot ID.

The performance impact should be pretty negligible in vast majority of
cases, as we'd do this only when:
  - opening a new file
  - comparing entries across different boots
  - advancing to a next location

The first case is a one-time thing only per journal. The second and
third case might call this a bit more frequently, but we fall through to
the _MACHINE_ID= parsing only if the journal file got a new entry since
the last check. The most significant impact would be on journals that
are being actively written into, but even then iterating through the
handful of typical fields is negligible compared to what the rest of the
function does. Also, since 8f8ab4bf98 the
journal_file_read_tail_timestamp() calls are ratelimited when walking
through the journal, lessening the impact even further.

Resolves: #34169
2026-08-08 04:05:25 +09:00
2026-08-08 04:00:31 +09:00
2026-07-28 19:46:34 +09:00

Systemd

System and Service Manager

OBS Packages Status
Semaphore CI 2.0 Build Status
Coverity Scan Status
OSS-Fuzz Status
CIFuzz
CII Best Practices
Fossies codespell report
Translation status
Coverage Status
Packaging status
OpenSSF Scorecard

Details

Most documentation is available on systemd's website.

Assorted, older, general information about systemd can be found in the systemd Wiki.

Information about build requirements is provided in the README file.

Consult our NEWS file for information about what's new in the most recent systemd versions.

Please see the Code Map for information about this repository's layout and content.

Please see the Hacking guide for information on how to hack on systemd and test your modifications.

Please see our Contribution Guidelines for more information about filing GitHub Issues and posting GitHub Pull Requests.

When preparing patches for systemd, please follow our Coding Style Guidelines.

If you are looking for support, please contact our mailing list, join our IRC channel #systemd on libera.chat or Matrix channel

Stable branches with backported patches are available in the stable repo.

We have a security bug bounty program sponsored by the Sovereign Tech Fund hosted on YesWeHack

Repositories with distribution packages built from git main are available on OBS, and also repositories with packages built from the latest stable release

Description
No description provided
Readme Cite this repository 856 MiB
Languages
C 88.7%
Shell 5.4%
Python 4.7%
Meson 1.1%