Eric Curtin c99678eeda core/bpf-restrict-fs: avoid loading the LSM BPF program twice at boot
bpf_restrict_fs_setup() is always called right after a successful
bpf_restrict_fs_supported(true) probe (see manager_setup() in
manager.c). Previously the probe independently opened, sized and
kernel-verifier-loaded the BPF object via prepare_restrict_fs_bpf(),
then did a trial LSM attach/detach via bpf_can_link_lsm_program() to
confirm the program *could* attach, and threw the whole object away
-- only for bpf_restrict_fs_setup() to build and verifier-load an
identical one from scratch again for the real, permanent attach.

The trial attach in the probe is redundant: if BPF_LSM_MAC attach
isn't actually usable (e.g. no BPF trampoline support on the running
architecture/kernel), bpf_restrict_fs_setup()'s own
sym_bpf_program__attach_lsm() call will simply fail, and that failure
is already logged and handled gracefully by its caller in manager.c
(logged as a warning, systemd continues without RestrictFileSystems=
enforcement). So bpf_restrict_fs_supported() only needs to check
whether the BPF LSM hook is enabled in the kernel at all
(lsm_supported("bpf")); it doesn't need to open/load/attach the BPF
program itself. Drop that from the probe, so the program is opened,
sized and verified by the kernel exactly once per boot instead of
twice.

Since the probe no longer verifies that the LSM BPF program can
actually attach, test-bpf-restrict-fs.c can no longer rely on
bpf_restrict_fs_supported(true) alone to skip on kernels/architectures
where the hook is listed but the real attach fails (e.g. missing BPF
trampoline support). Have the test also check m->restrict_fs after
manager_startup() and skip if the program never got attached, instead
of proceeding to hard-fail the enforcement assertions.
2026-07-28 21:33:38 +09:00
2026-07-08 08:23:04 +02:00
2026-04-18 14:24:47 +01:00
2026-06-17 09:59:34 +00:00
2025-06-05 14:39:20 +02:00
2026-03-06 08:55:55 +01:00
2025-10-07 13:00:12 +01:00
2026-07-28 19:46:34 +09:00

Systemd

System and Service Manager

OBS Packages Status
Semaphore CI 2.0 Build Status
Coverity Scan Status
OSS-Fuzz Status
CIFuzz
CII Best Practices
Fossies codespell report
Translation status
Coverage Status
Packaging status
OpenSSF Scorecard

Details

Most documentation is available on systemd's website.

Assorted, older, general information about systemd can be found in the systemd Wiki.

Information about build requirements is provided in the README file.

Consult our NEWS file for information about what's new in the most recent systemd versions.

Please see the Code Map for information about this repository's layout and content.

Please see the Hacking guide for information on how to hack on systemd and test your modifications.

Please see our Contribution Guidelines for more information about filing GitHub Issues and posting GitHub Pull Requests.

When preparing patches for systemd, please follow our Coding Style Guidelines.

If you are looking for support, please contact our mailing list, join our IRC channel #systemd on libera.chat or Matrix channel

Stable branches with backported patches are available in the stable repo.

We have a security bug bounty program sponsored by the Sovereign Tech Fund hosted on YesWeHack

Repositories with distribution packages built from git main are available on OBS, and also repositories with packages built from the latest stable release

Description
No description provided
Readme Cite this repository 857 MiB
Languages
C 88.7%
Shell 5.4%
Python 4.7%
Meson 1.1%