mirror of
https://github.com/git/git.git
synced 2026-08-09 09:34:14 +00:00
promisor-remote: refactor should_accept_remote() control flow
A previous commit made sure we now reject empty URLs early at parse time. This makes the existing warning() in case a remote URL is NULL or empty very unlikely to be useful. In future work, we also plan to add URL-based acceptance logic into should_accept_remote(). To adapt to previous changes and prepare for upcoming changes, let's restructure the control flow in should_accept_remote(). Concretely, let's: - Replace the warning() in case of an empty URL with a BUG(), as a previous commit made sure empty URLs are rejected early at parse time. - Move that modified empty-URL check to the very top of the function, so that every acceptance mode, instead of only ACCEPT_KNOWN_URL, is covered. - Invert the URL comparison: instead of returning on match and warning on mismatch, return early on mismatch and let the match case fall through. This opens a single exit path at the bottom of the function for future commits to extend. Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Junio C Hamano
parent
3b4f0403d1
commit
64f0f6b88a
@@ -651,6 +651,11 @@ static int should_accept_remote(enum accept_promisor accept,
|
||||
const char *remote_name = advertised->name;
|
||||
const char *remote_url = advertised->url;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!remote_url || !*remote_url)
|
||||
BUG("no or empty URL advertised for remote '%s'; "
|
||||
"this remote should have been rejected earlier",
|
||||
remote_name);
|
||||
|
||||
if (accept == ACCEPT_ALL)
|
||||
return all_fields_match(advertised, config_info, NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -669,19 +674,14 @@ static int should_accept_remote(enum accept_promisor accept,
|
||||
if (accept != ACCEPT_KNOWN_URL)
|
||||
BUG("Unhandled 'enum accept_promisor' value '%d'", accept);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!remote_url || !*remote_url) {
|
||||
warning(_("no or empty URL advertised for remote '%s', "
|
||||
"ignoring this remote"), remote_name);
|
||||
if (strcmp(p->url, remote_url)) {
|
||||
warning(_("known remote named '%s' but with URL '%s' instead of '%s', "
|
||||
"ignoring this remote"),
|
||||
remote_name, p->url, remote_url);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!strcmp(p->url, remote_url))
|
||||
return all_fields_match(advertised, config_info, p);
|
||||
|
||||
warning(_("known remote named '%s' but with URL '%s' instead of '%s', "
|
||||
"ignoring this remote"), remote_name, p->url, remote_url);
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
return all_fields_match(advertised, config_info, p);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int skip_field_name_prefix(const char *elem, const char *field_name, const char **value)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user