# Sandbox API The Sandbox API introduces a first class sandbox primitive for managing groups of containers that share resources and a common lifecycle. It is entirely based on the existing [Runtime v2](../core/runtime/v2/README.md) shim architecture, extending the shim model with dedicated sandbox lifecycle management. ## Background In the Runtime v2 model, containerd launches a shim process for each container. The shim exposes a [`TaskService`](../api/runtime/task/v3/shim.proto) over a ttrpc (or gRPC) socket, and containerd sends create/start/stop/delete commands over that connection. This works well for individual containers, but breaks down when containers need to be grouped into a shared execution environment — a sandbox. In Kubernetes, a Pod is a group of containers that are scheduled together and share resources such as a network namespace. To implement this, Kubernetes uses a "pause container" — a minimal container whose sole purpose is to act as a parent process and hold shared namespaces alive. Application containers then join these namespaces when they start. The Sandbox API aims to generalize this concept. It models a sandbox as a parent environment for a group of containers — one that starts first and ends last, acquiring shared resources (such as a network namespace or an IP address) that child containers then join. > [!NOTE] > The terms "pod sandbox" and "sandbox" refer to different things in this document. A **pod sandbox** is the > Kubernetes-specific concept used in the CRI plugin and Kubernetes gRPC APIs (e.g. `RunPodSandbox`), traditionally > implemented via a pause container. A **sandbox** is the general abstraction defined by the Sandbox API — a pod > sandbox is one possible implementation of it. Before the Sandbox API, containerd had no first class notion of this grouping. The pause container lifecycle and sandbox metadata were managed entirely inside the CRI plugin. This approach has several flaws: - One-size-fits-all: the implementation assumed every sandbox was a pause container. Runtimes with a different model, such as VM-based runtimes that manage their own sandbox (VMM), had no way to plug in. - No extension points: the sandbox lifecycle lived inside the CRI plugin, so runtime authors could not customize behavior for their runtime. - Shim lifecycle tied to tasks: the shim process was created and destroyed with the task, but a sandbox needs a shim that stays alive while containers come and go. The Sandbox API provides an abstraction around pod sandbox implementations, so that runtime authors can provide their own implementation without having to modify containerd or the CRI plugin. The design goals are: 1. Provide a better abstraction around container grouping to support non-standard use cases, such as microVM-style containers, behind a common [`Controller`](../core/sandbox/controller.go) interface. See the [`SandboxService`](../api/runtime/sandbox/v1/sandbox.proto) proto definition for the full RPC surface. 2. Make the CRI plugin in containerd less opinionated and free of implementation details. Pause containers are expected to become one of the Sandbox API implementations, not a hardcoded assumption. ## Flow The following sequence diagram shows the flow of CRI calls when kubelet creates a pod with one application container, using the `shim` sandbox controller. Container-specific details (snapshots, OCI spec, NRI hooks, exit monitors) are omitted — the focus is on the Sandbox API interactions. ```mermaid sequenceDiagram participant kubelet participant containerd participant shim autonumber Note over kubelet,shim: RunPodSandbox kubelet->>containerd: CRI RunPodSandbox containerd->>containerd: Create sandbox metadata in store containerd->>containerd: Create network namespace containerd->>containerd: Setup pod network (CNI) containerd->>containerd: SandboxController.Create Note right of containerd: shim controller launches shim binary containerd->>shim: Start shim process shim-->>containerd: Socket address containerd->>shim: SandboxService.CreateSandbox shim-->>containerd: OK containerd->>containerd: SandboxController.Start containerd->>shim: SandboxService.StartSandbox shim-->>containerd: Sandbox PID, endpoint containerd->>containerd: Store sandbox endpoint in metadata containerd-->>kubelet: PodSandboxId Note over kubelet,shim: CreateContainer kubelet->>containerd: CRI CreateContainer(PodSandboxId) containerd->>containerd: Lookup sandbox metadata containerd->>shim: SandboxService.SandboxStatus / Platform shim-->>containerd: Status, platform info containerd->>containerd: Create container metadata (linked to sandbox) containerd-->>kubelet: ContainerId Note over kubelet,shim: StartContainer kubelet->>containerd: CRI StartContainer(ContainerId) containerd->>containerd: Lookup sandbox endpoint containerd->>shim: TaskService.Create / Start (reuse sandbox shim connection) shim-->>containerd: OK containerd-->>kubelet: OK Note over kubelet,shim: Container runs inside sandbox namespaces Note over kubelet,shim: StopPodSandbox kubelet->>containerd: CRI StopPodSandbox loop for each container in sandbox containerd->>shim: TaskService.Kill / Delete shim-->>containerd: OK end containerd->>containerd: SandboxController.Stop containerd->>shim: SandboxService.StopSandbox shim-->>containerd: OK containerd-->>kubelet: OK Note over kubelet,shim: RemovePodSandbox kubelet->>containerd: CRI RemovePodSandbox containerd->>containerd: Ensure sandbox stopped containerd->>containerd: Cleanup container metadata containerd->>containerd: SandboxController.Shutdown containerd->>shim: SandboxService.ShutdownSandbox shim-->>containerd: OK containerd->>containerd: Delete sandbox metadata containerd-->>kubelet: OK ``` ## Controller Implementations There are two `Controller` implementations today: - `shim` — shim binaries that support the Sandbox API flow implement the [`SandboxService`](../api/runtime/sandbox/v1/sandbox.proto) RPCs and handle sandbox lifecycle natively. This is the target model that the Sandbox API was designed for. - `podsandbox` — the pause container implementation, currently living in the CRI [`podsandbox/`](../internal/cri/server/podsandbox) package. The `podsandbox` controller technically satisfies the `Controller` interface, but in practice it acts as an in-memory implementation tightly coupled to the CRI layer. It lives there due to refactoring complexity — moving it out cleanly is a large incremental effort that has been ongoing since the Sandbox API was first introduced in containerd 1.7, and improves with every release. ## Status The Sandbox API was first introduced in containerd 1.7 as an experimental API and was promoted to stable in 2.0. It is still evolving; ongoing work can be tracked in [#9431](https://github.com/containerd/containerd/issues/9431).